Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marlon Vankan vs John Sperle Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vankan vs Sperle analysis and find out who is favored!
Marlon Vankan vs John Sperle Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Vankan 0 - 0 Sperle
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vankan has won 46.25% of points on their second serve, while Sperle has won 48.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vankan, in recent form, has won 51.56% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sperle has won 54.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.43% and 38.08% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vankan has saved 56.06% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sperle has saved 54.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vankan has won 57.58% of matches played (W/L 38/ 28), with Sperle winning 64.1% (W/L 50/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vankan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 114/ 89), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17). Sperle has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 90/ 56), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Vankan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.73% of matches (W/L 37/ 26), where as Sperle has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.33% of matches (W/L 49/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vankan has played against opponents with an average rank of 167.05 while Sperle has played against players with an average rank of 101.92.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vankan has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sperle has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vankan has converted 42.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sperle has converted 46.07% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
532
Rank
524
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
734
Rank
734
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
53% (127-112)
Career Total W/L
59% (112-78)
50% (12-12)
YTD W/L
66% (23-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marlon Vankan | John Sperle |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (12/12) | 66% (23/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (28/30) | 63% (50/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (253/272) | 55% (421/347) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (12/12) | 69% (18/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 30 | 64 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 57 | 63 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:58 | 1:40:18 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 125.88 | 37.26 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1169/1742) | 61% (1345/2204) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (728/1169) | 66% (881/1345) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (265/573) | 49% (418/859) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (75/178) | 46% (123/267) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (672/1663) | 45% (955/2127) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (11/11) | 66% (23/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (11/23) | 66% (23/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 58% (7/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (14/10) | 91% (23/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (14/4) | 9% (23/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 17% (12/2) |
Marlon Vankan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Elmer Moller
Player
Marlon Vankan
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Marlon Vankan
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Faris Zakaryia
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Norbert Marosik
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Hrazdil
Player
Marlon Vankan
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Marlon Vankan
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Eero Vasa
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 3-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Artur Kukasian
67%
(
82 of
122)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
46%
(
56 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
107
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
John Sperle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
John Sperle
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Stefan Latinovic
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
John Sperle
60%
(
56 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Maxim Mrva
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve %
36%
(
35 of
97)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Edoardo Zanada
59%
(
69 of
116)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
41%
(
48 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
109
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
John Sperle
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Andrin Casanova
48%
(
34 of
71)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
41%
(
17 of
41)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Saba Purtseladze
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
John Sperle
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Vankan Vs Sperle Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
